AUTOMATION CHECK

It says it worked. That is not the same as it working.

If you have an automation set up in n8n, the tool that quietly moves things between your systems, I check whether it actually produces the result you wanted, not just whether it reports success. In 48 hours you get a report you can read without a technical person sitting next to you: what I checked, what I found, and what I could not check.

Request the fixed-price audit See the example report →

THE DIFFERENCE IS THE RECEIPT

You can see what the audit did, and what it did not do.

Every delivery keeps what I saw apart from what I concluded. Something that loads without complaining is not called tested. A step that ran is not called correct until what came out of it matches what should have.

CHECKEDWhat goes in, the rules it follows, the choices it makes and what happens when something goes wrong.

FOUNDEach problem names the step, what actually happened, what should have happened, and the evidence for both.

NOT CHECKEDLogins, other companies' systems and paths I could not safely try are listed by name, never quietly left out.

SCOPE

One automation. One result it is supposed to produce. One report you can read.

I read it first

Every step, every setting and every place it decides between two paths, before anything is run.

Then I run it

With safe test material you provide, including the awkward cases: nothing arrives, or something arrives broken.

Then I write it down

What each problem costs you in practice, the evidence for it, and what fixing it would take.

FIXED PRICE

USD 750

One automation of up to 25 steps, delivered within 48 hours of getting access and something to test with. Audit and report; implementation is quoted separately unless explicitly included.

A written report, plus the same findings as a file your developer can use
One clarification round
Nothing is changed in your live system without your written go-ahead
If something cannot be tested, the report says so and why, instead of quietly skipping it

REAL FAILURE CLASS

The information was there. The automation was looking in the wrong place.

An automation was set up to read the attachment on an incoming email, but it looked for it under the wrong name. Every single email failed at that first step, and the number of invoices that reached the spreadsheet was zero, while everything on screen looked healthy. The part that mattered was not noticing the mistake. It was writing down exactly which step failed, that the result was zero, what the fix was, and that the fix had not been re-run yet. For your technical person: it read $json.filename where the mail trigger puts attachments under $binary.

Open the full example receipt →